Search This Blog

Monday, April 14, 2025

Luigi Mangione - Hot. Young. Murderer.

Luigi Mangione is accused of fatally shooting UnitedHealthCare CEO Brian Thompson. The shooting occurred outside a Manhattan hotel where Thompson was scheduled to speak at a conference. Mangione was arrested in Pennsylvania five days after the shooting.

Luigi Mangione


 













United Health Care CEO Brian Thompson


 

 

 

 

 

 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Lawyers for Luigi Mangione, the man accused of killing United Healthcare’s chief executive officer, are asking a federal judge to block the Justice Department from seeking the death penalty, calling the decision a “political stunt.”

Earlier this month Attorney General Pam Bondi announced the Justice Department would pursue the death penalty in Mangione’s case, fulfilling President Donald Trump’s campaign promise to resume federal executions.

Mangione’s attorneys are seeking court intervention, arguing that the Justice Department should be prevented from seeking the death penalty because it didn’t follow certain protocols and violated Mangione’s due process.

Bondi’s public statements, they argue, also tainted the grand jury pool.

“The stakes could not be higher. The United States government intends to kill Mr. Mangione as a political stunt,” his lawyers wrote to the judge. “Mr. Mangione’s counsel asked for three months to prepare a fulsome mitigation submission to the Department of Justice’s Capital Committee and was ignored.”

Bondi has said she will direct the interim US attorney for the Southern District of New York, Matthew Podolsky, to seek the death penalty in the case if Mangione is convicted on capital murder charges. A spokesperson for the US attorney’s office in Manhattan declined to comment on the case on Friday.

Mangione, 26, is facing state and federal murder charges for allegedly gunning down United Healthcare CEO Brian Thompson outside of a hotel in midtown Manhattan last year.

Mangione has pleaded not guilty to the state charges. He was charged in a federal criminal complaint but has not yet been indicted on federal charges. One of the federal charges, murder through the use of a firearm, carries a maximum sentence of death, if convicted.

Since Bondi’s announcement, donations to Mangione’s legal defense fund have poured in. Supporters have contributed over $850,000 in total, with many recent donations citing the Justice Department’s decision to seek the death penalty.

----------------------------------------

As far as Mr. Mangione’s sentence goes, he faces the possibility of the death penalty in federal court and a potential life sentence without parole in state court. The federal charges include using a firearm to commit murder and interstate stalking, both of which carry a potential death sentence. The state charges, brought by Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg, include first-degree murder in furtherance of an act of terrorism. Mangione has pleaded not guilty to both state and federal charges. The Justice Department has decided to pursue the death penalty in the federal case, while the state case is expected to proceed separately. 

Luigi Mangione faces the possibility of the death penalty in his federal case, following U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi's announcement on April 1, 2025. This is due to the charges of using a firearm to commit murder, interstate stalking, and using interstate facilities to stalk, all resulting in death, which carry a maximum potential sentence of death or life in prison. In contrast, the state charges, which he has also pleaded not guilty to, carry a maximum penalty of life imprisonment without the possibility of parole. 

------------------------------

As attractive, as hot and as smart as he is, I’m pretty sure A.G. Pam Bondi will succeed in her pursuit of the death penalty for Mr. Mangione. I don’t believe, given her loyalty and fealty to Trump that she’d just let this go, as it’s a case out of New York City.

She wants and NEEDS to prove to Trump how “tough” she can be.

I agree with Mr. Mangione that healthcare costs are stupidly and unreasonably high and outrageous.  You don’t need to nickel and dime your patients to death, literally sometimes, in order to do your job well or fairly.  That said, however, there’s NO EXCUSE for Mr. Mangione’s behavior and murdering United Healthcare’s CEO, Brian Thompson for doing his job.

 

 

God save Luigi Mangione’s soul.

Monday, March 24, 2025

... just a reminder

Ah, remember this?  When an insurrection was just a "normal day with tourists" or a "day of love?"  

Yeah.  Not so much.


Or one of Donnie's many court appearance in New York City on fraud charges?

Trump 1.0


Trump 2.0
From the Colorado State House.  Donnie, apparently, really doesn't like this one:

For some reason, you know, because, he "tweeted/Truthed" the 1.0 and 2.0 pictures over the March 22 & 23, 2025 weekend.  I guess as a reminder to himself that, "he's YOUR favorite president."

 

Go figure.


And then just this morning, Tuesday, March 25, 2025, from CNN:

https://www.cnn.com/2025/03/24/style/colorado-capitol-trump-portrait-taken-down/index.html

Alien and Sedition Acts (1798)

 

This is the official document from 1798.

What is the Alien Enemies Act?

The Alien Enemies Act of 1798 is a wartime authority that allows the president to detain or deport the natives and citizens of an enemy nation. The law permits the president to target these immigrants without a hearing and based only on their country of birth or citizenship. Although the law was enacted to prevent foreign espionage and sabotage in wartime, it can be — and has been — wielded against immigrants who have done nothing wrong, have evinced no signs of disloyalty, and are lawfully present in the United States. It is an overbroad authority that may violate constitutional rights in wartime and is subject to abuse in peacetime.

Has the Alien Enemies Act been used in the past?

The Alien Enemies Act has been invoked three times, each time during a major conflict: the War of 1812, World War I, and World War II. In World Wars I and II, the law was a key authority behind detentions, expulsions, and restrictions targeting German, Austro-Hungarian, Japanese, and Italian immigrants based solely on their ancestry. The law is best known for its role in Japanese internment, a shameful part of U.S. history for which Congress, presidents, and the courts have apologized.

Under what conditions can the president invoke the Alien Enemies Act?

The president may invoke the Alien Enemies Act in times of “declared war” or when a foreign government threatens or undertakes an “invasion” or “predatory incursion” against U.S. territory. The Constitution gives Congress, not the president, the power to declare war, so the president must wait for democratic debate and a congressional vote to invoke the Alien Enemies Act based on a declared war. But the president need not wait for Congress to invoke the law based on a threatened or ongoing invasion or predatory incursion. The president has inherent authority to repel these kinds of sudden attacks — an authority that necessarily implies the discretion to decide when an invasion or predatory incursion is underway.

The Bonehead-in-Cheese thought it would be a "good idea" to invoke this act in order to speed up his mass deportation of "illegal aliens". 

You remember.  "Bad hombres."

Thankfully the courts are stepping in and, for the time being, putting the breaks on his shenanigans.  AGAIN.

His biggest problem with invoking this war time act, aside from the narrow scope of it, in March 2025,  we're NOT at war with ANY country right now.  That's one of Congress' jobs, to invoke and call it a "war." 

Now, of course Trump has said, "We've been invaded by these thugs, criminals and gang members."  Makes him sound tough, which we know, he isn't. 

And then ICE isn't specifically targeting any "gang members", but people he and his admenstruation "perceive to be gang members."  Big difference.

US District Judge James Boasberg

Judge Boasberg has called out the Trump Admenstruation for its handling of undocumented immigrants and their swift, no-due-process expulsion from the U.S. For their part the administration has stumbled, hemmed and hahhed, grasping at straws to come up with a valid, real reason(s) for those deportations.  

*Crickets.*

Stay Tuned.

Tuesday, March 18, 2025

The Ides Of March

Basic, Tertiary Google Search, March 15, 2025 (The Ides Of March)

karoline leavitt statement to the press regarding the courts interfering with trump's agenda

That search yielded dozens of articles from various news organizations and outlets regarding Karoline Leavitt in her official capacity as the current White House Press Secretary.   She’s the youngest ever White House Press Secretary at 29 years old.

It shows. And it’s painful to watch.

I think what I find most annoying with these people, the ones who work for, cherish Trump, is the smug ass smirk on their ugly mugs.

We still remember the very first Trump Press Secretary, Sean Spicer, and how he told the press the day after Trump’s Inauguration, January 21, 2017:

“I commit to always telling you, the members of the press, the truth from behind this podium.”

That last about 5 minutes.  And then his infamous rant about Trump’s crowd size the day before, wherein he actually shouted at the press: “Biggest crowd EVER for an inauguration.  EVER!”

We quickly found out from the National Parks Service that no, in fact it was one of the smallest.  Chalk it up to Trump’s teeny, tiny delicate ego.

----------------Just this past week from various news organizations:

From NPR:

As judges block broad actions, White House says courts causing constitutional crisis

Since President Trump's return to office last month, federal judges have notably halted several moves geared at drastically reforming parts of the federal government and U.S. immigration policy through a number of preliminary rulings and injunctions.

At least one federal judge has said the administration has failed to fully comply with a temporary restraining order in a case challenging the administration's attempts to freeze payments for grants and other programs.

Critics of the administration have pointed to the various rulings as clear evidence that the president is overstepping his authority and thrusting the U.S. into a constitutional crisis.

But the White House is firing back, arguing that the real danger is coming from judges who have ruled against Trump.

"The real constitutional crisis is taking place within our judicial branch, where District Court judges and liberal districts across the country are abusing their power to unilaterally block President Trump's basic executive authority," White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt told reporters during a briefing on Wednesday.

Leavitt called the orders that federal judges have made against the administration's agenda a "continuation of the weaponization of justice" against Trump.

-----------------------------

From NBC:

With mass rehirings ordered and a plea to the Supreme Court, Trump's court fights scale new heights

Judges this week ordered the government to reinstate thousands of workers, while the administration turned to the Supreme Court for help rolling back judicial powers.

The scale of the Trump administration's legal battles expanded this week, with a federal judge ordering the government to rehire potentially thousands of probationary workers and the administration turning to the Supreme Court to combat the large number of nationwide injunctions slowing its agenda.

The orders by U.S. District Judges William Alsup and James Bredar on Thursday were among the largest-scale rulings against the administration to date out of the more than 100 lawsuits it's facing as a result of its efforts to reshape the government. The orders give at least a temporary reprieve to tens of thousands of fired workers.

The administration, meanwhile, has clearly grown frustrated with the repeated intervention from the courts. It went to the Supreme Court on Wednesday to challenge three nationwide orders barring President Donald Trump's executive order on birthright citizenship from being implemented — and asking the court to "declare that enough is enough" when it comes to such orders.

Here's a look at the biggest legal developments of the past week.

You're rehired

In a pair of rulings Thursday, judges in California and Maryland found the administration acted unlawfully when it directed mass layoffs of an unspecified number of the federal government's roughly 200,000 probationary workers — workers who were either recently hired or promoted to new positions. The government has not released the total number of employees who were laid off, but a coalition of states that sued over the firings in Maryland estimated it to be roughly 24,000 people.

In the more wide-ranging of the orders, the Maryland judge, James Bredar, said the government "must follow certain rules" when it conducts mass layoffs.

"In this case, the government conducted massive layoffs, but it gave no advanced notice. It claims it wasn't required to because, it says, it dismissed each one of these thousands of probationary employees for 'performance' or other individualized reasons. On the record before the Court, this isn't true," Bredar wrote. "They were all just fired. Collectively."

He ordered the actions removing them be stayed for at least 14 days while he weighs a longer-term preliminary injunction, and directed the employees be reinstated by Monday at 1 p.m. ET.

------------------------

From The Associated Press (AP):

White House says it’s the judges — not Trump — causing a ‘constitutional crisis’

WASHINGTON (AP) — In the weeks since Donald Trump returned to office, Democrats and legal scholars have warned that he’s provoking a constitutional crisis by trying to expand his power and ignore laws that stand in his way.

On Wednesday, the White House had a new response to that. It’s not the president who is causing the problem, said press secretary Karoline Leavitt, it’s the judges who are blocking some of his agenda by saying it’s illegal.

“We believe these judges are acting as judicial activists rather than honest arbiters of the law,” Leavitt told reporters. She insisted that “the real constitutional crisis is taking place within our judicial branch.”

The denunciation, delivered from the lectern in the White House briefing room, was the latest example of an escalating assault on the court system from Trump and his allies. Supporters have circulated pictures of judges online, made claims about their families and suggested that the Republican president simply ignore their orders.

Elon Musk, Trump’s most powerful adviser, has used his social media platform X to amplify attacks.

“This evil judge must be fired,” he wrote about a member of the bench who ordered the Trump administration to restore health-related webpages and datasets scrubbed from government websites, including reports on HIV prevention and guidance on reproductive health care.

------------------------------

From WHYY Media (in partnership with NPR and PBS)

AP sues 3 Trump administration officials, citing freedom of speech

AP alleges an unconstitutional effort by the White House to control speech — in this case refusing to change its style from the Gulf of Mexico to the “Gulf of America."

The Associated Press sued three Trump administration officials Friday over access to presidential events, citing freedom of speech in asking a federal judge to stop the 10-day blocking of its journalists.

The lawsuit was filed Friday afternoon in U.S. District Court in Washington, D.C.

The AP says its case is about an unconstitutional effort by the White House to control speech — in this case refusing to change its style from the Gulf of Mexico to the “Gulf of America,” as President Donald Trump did last month with an executive order.

“The press and all people in the United States have the right to choose their own words and not be retaliated against by the government,” the AP said in its lawsuit, which names White House Chief of Staff Susan Wiles, Deputy Chief of Staff Taylor Budowich and Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt.

“We’re going to keep them out until such time as they agree that it’s the Gulf of America,” Trump said Tuesday.

This week, about 40 news organizations signed onto a letter organized by the White House Correspondents Association, urging the White House to reverse its policy against the AP.

---------------------------

The lower courts, federal and state level, are fighting back against these unconstitutional and illegal actions on the part of Dick-tater, Trump and his loyal minions. It should probably be "dickless-tater" since we know he was a micro-penis and regularly poops himself.  

💩💩💩💩💩💩💩💩💩💩💩💩💩💩💩

---------------------------

The issue isn't specifically with Leavitt, although she's not doing herself any favors to regularly, repeatedly lying to the media/press.  She's doing what Trump and/or his Chief of Staff directs her to do: Lie, downplay, deflect, deny and so on.

It's a small but important step that the courts have stepped in and ordered the Trump Administration to pump the breaks, but then what? We know as of mid-March 2025, they, the administration are simply pushing the boundaries, daring the courts to take further actions. And they're going to continue doing that, until eventually SCOTUS will have to step in and deny some of Trump's moves and actions. 

Until then, it's a waiting game.  Clutch your pearls.