Search This Blog

Monday, March 24, 2025

... just a reminder

Ah, remember this?  When an insurrection was just a "normal day with tourists" or a "day of love?"  

Yeah.  Not so much.


Or one of Donnie's many court appearance in New York City on fraud charges?

Trump 1.0


Trump 2.0
From the Colorado State House.  Donnie, apparently, really doesn't like this one:

For some reason, you know, because, he "tweeted/Truthed" the 1.0 and 2.0 pictures over the March 22 & 23, 2025 weekend.  I guess as a reminder to himself that, "he's YOUR favorite president."

 

Go figure.


And then just this morning, Tuesday, March 25, 2025, from CNN:

https://www.cnn.com/2025/03/24/style/colorado-capitol-trump-portrait-taken-down/index.html

Alien and Sedition Acts (1798)

 

This is the official document from 1798.

What is the Alien Enemies Act?

The Alien Enemies Act of 1798 is a wartime authority that allows the president to detain or deport the natives and citizens of an enemy nation. The law permits the president to target these immigrants without a hearing and based only on their country of birth or citizenship. Although the law was enacted to prevent foreign espionage and sabotage in wartime, it can be — and has been — wielded against immigrants who have done nothing wrong, have evinced no signs of disloyalty, and are lawfully present in the United States. It is an overbroad authority that may violate constitutional rights in wartime and is subject to abuse in peacetime.

Has the Alien Enemies Act been used in the past?

The Alien Enemies Act has been invoked three times, each time during a major conflict: the War of 1812, World War I, and World War II. In World Wars I and II, the law was a key authority behind detentions, expulsions, and restrictions targeting German, Austro-Hungarian, Japanese, and Italian immigrants based solely on their ancestry. The law is best known for its role in Japanese internment, a shameful part of U.S. history for which Congress, presidents, and the courts have apologized.

Under what conditions can the president invoke the Alien Enemies Act?

The president may invoke the Alien Enemies Act in times of “declared war” or when a foreign government threatens or undertakes an “invasion” or “predatory incursion” against U.S. territory. The Constitution gives Congress, not the president, the power to declare war, so the president must wait for democratic debate and a congressional vote to invoke the Alien Enemies Act based on a declared war. But the president need not wait for Congress to invoke the law based on a threatened or ongoing invasion or predatory incursion. The president has inherent authority to repel these kinds of sudden attacks — an authority that necessarily implies the discretion to decide when an invasion or predatory incursion is underway.

The Bonehead-in-Cheese thought it would be a "good idea" to invoke this act in order to speed up his mass deportation of "illegal aliens". 

You remember.  "Bad hombres."

Thankfully the courts are stepping in and, for the time being, putting the breaks on his shenanigans.  AGAIN.

His biggest problem with invoking this war time act, aside from the narrow scope of it, in March 2025,  we're NOT at war with ANY country right now.  That's one of Congress' jobs, to invoke and call it a "war." 

Now, of course Trump has said, "We've been invaded by these thugs, criminals and gang members."  Makes him sound tough, which we know, he isn't. 

And then ICE isn't specifically targeting any "gang members", but people he and his admenstruation "perceive to be gang members.  Big difference.

US District Judge James Boasberg

Judge Boasberg has called out the Trump Admenstruation for its handling of undocumented immigrants and their swift, no-due-process expulsion from the U.S. For their part the administration has stumbled, hemmed and hahhed, grasping at straws to come up with a valid, real reason(s) for those deportations.  

*Crickets.*

Stay Tuned.

Tuesday, March 18, 2025

The Ides Of March

Basic, Tertiary Google Search, March 15, 2025 (The Ides Of March)

karoline leavitt statement to the press regarding the courts interfering with trump's agenda

That search yielded dozens of articles from various news organizations and outlets regarding Karoline Leavitt in her official capacity as the current White House Press Secretary.   She’s the youngest ever White House Press Secretary at 29 years old.

It shows. And it’s painful to watch.

I think what I find most annoying with these people, the ones who work for, cherish Trump, is the smug ass smirk on their ugly mugs.

We still remember the very first Trump Press Secretary, Sean Spicer, and how he told the press the day after Trump’s Inauguration, January 21, 2017:

“I commit to always telling you, the members of the press, the truth from behind this podium.”

That last about 5 minutes.  And then his infamous rant about Trump’s crowd size the day before, wherein he actually shouted at the press: “Biggest crowd EVER for an inauguration.  EVER!”

We quickly found out from the National Parks Service that no, in fact it was one of the smallest.  Chalk it up to Trump’s teeny, tiny delicate ego.

----------------Just this past week from various news organizations:

From NPR:

As judges block broad actions, White House says courts causing constitutional crisis

Since President Trump's return to office last month, federal judges have notably halted several moves geared at drastically reforming parts of the federal government and U.S. immigration policy through a number of preliminary rulings and injunctions.

At least one federal judge has said the administration has failed to fully comply with a temporary restraining order in a case challenging the administration's attempts to freeze payments for grants and other programs.

Critics of the administration have pointed to the various rulings as clear evidence that the president is overstepping his authority and thrusting the U.S. into a constitutional crisis.

But the White House is firing back, arguing that the real danger is coming from judges who have ruled against Trump.

"The real constitutional crisis is taking place within our judicial branch, where District Court judges and liberal districts across the country are abusing their power to unilaterally block President Trump's basic executive authority," White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt told reporters during a briefing on Wednesday.

Leavitt called the orders that federal judges have made against the administration's agenda a "continuation of the weaponization of justice" against Trump.

-----------------------------

From NBC:

With mass rehirings ordered and a plea to the Supreme Court, Trump's court fights scale new heights

Judges this week ordered the government to reinstate thousands of workers, while the administration turned to the Supreme Court for help rolling back judicial powers.

The scale of the Trump administration's legal battles expanded this week, with a federal judge ordering the government to rehire potentially thousands of probationary workers and the administration turning to the Supreme Court to combat the large number of nationwide injunctions slowing its agenda.

The orders by U.S. District Judges William Alsup and James Bredar on Thursday were among the largest-scale rulings against the administration to date out of the more than 100 lawsuits it's facing as a result of its efforts to reshape the government. The orders give at least a temporary reprieve to tens of thousands of fired workers.

The administration, meanwhile, has clearly grown frustrated with the repeated intervention from the courts. It went to the Supreme Court on Wednesday to challenge three nationwide orders barring President Donald Trump's executive order on birthright citizenship from being implemented — and asking the court to "declare that enough is enough" when it comes to such orders.

Here's a look at the biggest legal developments of the past week.

You're rehired

In a pair of rulings Thursday, judges in California and Maryland found the administration acted unlawfully when it directed mass layoffs of an unspecified number of the federal government's roughly 200,000 probationary workers — workers who were either recently hired or promoted to new positions. The government has not released the total number of employees who were laid off, but a coalition of states that sued over the firings in Maryland estimated it to be roughly 24,000 people.

In the more wide-ranging of the orders, the Maryland judge, James Bredar, said the government "must follow certain rules" when it conducts mass layoffs.

"In this case, the government conducted massive layoffs, but it gave no advanced notice. It claims it wasn't required to because, it says, it dismissed each one of these thousands of probationary employees for 'performance' or other individualized reasons. On the record before the Court, this isn't true," Bredar wrote. "They were all just fired. Collectively."

He ordered the actions removing them be stayed for at least 14 days while he weighs a longer-term preliminary injunction, and directed the employees be reinstated by Monday at 1 p.m. ET.

------------------------

From The Associated Press (AP):

White House says it’s the judges — not Trump — causing a ‘constitutional crisis’

WASHINGTON (AP) — In the weeks since Donald Trump returned to office, Democrats and legal scholars have warned that he’s provoking a constitutional crisis by trying to expand his power and ignore laws that stand in his way.

On Wednesday, the White House had a new response to that. It’s not the president who is causing the problem, said press secretary Karoline Leavitt, it’s the judges who are blocking some of his agenda by saying it’s illegal.

“We believe these judges are acting as judicial activists rather than honest arbiters of the law,” Leavitt told reporters. She insisted that “the real constitutional crisis is taking place within our judicial branch.”

The denunciation, delivered from the lectern in the White House briefing room, was the latest example of an escalating assault on the court system from Trump and his allies. Supporters have circulated pictures of judges online, made claims about their families and suggested that the Republican president simply ignore their orders.

Elon Musk, Trump’s most powerful adviser, has used his social media platform X to amplify attacks.

“This evil judge must be fired,” he wrote about a member of the bench who ordered the Trump administration to restore health-related webpages and datasets scrubbed from government websites, including reports on HIV prevention and guidance on reproductive health care.

------------------------------

From WHYY Media (in partnership with NPR and PBS)

AP sues 3 Trump administration officials, citing freedom of speech

AP alleges an unconstitutional effort by the White House to control speech — in this case refusing to change its style from the Gulf of Mexico to the “Gulf of America."

The Associated Press sued three Trump administration officials Friday over access to presidential events, citing freedom of speech in asking a federal judge to stop the 10-day blocking of its journalists.

The lawsuit was filed Friday afternoon in U.S. District Court in Washington, D.C.

The AP says its case is about an unconstitutional effort by the White House to control speech — in this case refusing to change its style from the Gulf of Mexico to the “Gulf of America,” as President Donald Trump did last month with an executive order.

“The press and all people in the United States have the right to choose their own words and not be retaliated against by the government,” the AP said in its lawsuit, which names White House Chief of Staff Susan Wiles, Deputy Chief of Staff Taylor Budowich and Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt.

“We’re going to keep them out until such time as they agree that it’s the Gulf of America,” Trump said Tuesday.

This week, about 40 news organizations signed onto a letter organized by the White House Correspondents Association, urging the White House to reverse its policy against the AP.

---------------------------

The lower courts, federal and state level, are fighting back against these unconstitutional and illegal actions on the part of Dick-tater, Trump and his loyal minions. It should probably be "dickless-tater" since we know he was a micro-penis and regularly poops himself.  

💩💩💩💩💩💩💩💩💩💩💩💩💩💩💩

---------------------------

The issue isn't specifically with Leavitt, although she's not doing herself any favors to regularly, repeatedly lying to the media/press.  She's doing what Trump and/or his Chief of Staff directs her to do: Lie, downplay, deflect, deny and so on.

It's a small but important step that the courts have stepped in and ordered the Trump Administration to pump the breaks, but then what? We know as of mid-March 2025, they, the administration are simply pushing the boundaries, daring the courts to take further actions. And they're going to continue doing that, until eventually SCOTUS will have to step in and deny some of Trump's moves and actions. 

Until then, it's a waiting game.  Clutch your pearls.

Monday, March 10, 2025

His Stupid, Repetitive Cycle

 And this is how it goes:

Enjoy.  Something Einstein said about insanity and repeating the same thing over and over again and expecting different results.

Sunday, March 2, 2025

How NOT to behave like an adult "politician" in The Oval Office

 So. Oval Office. Trump. Hillbilly Jay Dee, and the new leader of the Free World, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy.

HE SHOWED STRENGTH & COURAGE. 

Screaming, berating, ranting, raving.  AND complaining about his attire. Wow.

This was what the scene looked like from inside the room:


Why?  Simple. Trump wants to help his daddy, Vlad, rebuild the Russian Empire:  U.S.S.R. You may have heard about it a few generations ago. Ukraine was part of that "empire". 

The countries that were part of the Soviet Union included: Armenia, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Estonia, Georgia, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Latvia, Lithuania, Moldova, Russia (as the largest republic), Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, Ukraine, and Uzbekistan. And THAT is what Vlad Puffin wants to rebuild.  ONE. COUNTRY. AT. A. TIME. Bottom bitch boy, Donnie T. is all to happy to aid in those efforts.

 As of March 2025, these are the locations in Ukraine that Russia currently occupies:

Crimea and parts of Donetsk, Kharkiv, Kherson, Luhansk, Mykolayiv, and Zaporizhzhya Oblasts. The amount of Ukrainian territory Russia occupied shifted during the year.

And after President Zelenskyy was booted out of The White House, this was his response on Twitter/X:

And these were the responses back to President Zelenskyy:

Seems like it's past time for someone to have his poopy diapers changed?  Melanoma, maybe?

Friday, February 28, 2025

Impeached, Removing Judges Because Your "Agenda & Policies" Aren't Legal?

Lonnie Skum stepped in it. Again. Shocking, right?

No, not in the least.  

This was posted recently on Twitter:

 

Um, first, Lonnie, it's NOT the "rule of the people".  The correct verbiage is, "the rule of law."  Maybe you missed that Civic's lesson in school.

And further, NO, THAT DOES NOT APPLY IN AMERICA. 

Maybe if you return to your homeland, South Africa, they can teach you something about that.  

Oh, and before you leave, or get deported, talk to your co-President, Donnie about impeachment and rule of law.  He has firsthand knowledge of both of those topics!

Maybe Lonnie, Lon-E, should be paying more attention to his disastrous exploding cars and "cybertrucks" ?   Probably.

UPDATE: March 7, 2025:

This from a Tesla dealership in France

And this from a group of Tesla Charging Stations in Boston, MA

Watch your local and national news for more of these Tesla-related stories.  

Might be past time for Lonnie Skum (E-lon Musk) to go back to his sorta "real" job.

 

 

 

Have a nice day.  Elsewhere.